 |
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
p_c
Joined: 10 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yep..... oops.
 _________________ ------------
Paul Collison |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David Ashton
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Location: perth
|
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Jeff morgan"]I sent an email off to Standards about the Insulation /voltage rating of
the multi core cables we use etc. .
Also interesting thing, AS3000 /2007 now talks about third harmonics and adding them to final neutral calcs. Third harmonics and higher Should be taken as 100% and added onto the maximum out of balance load to determine neutral size.
This may have an impact on Plugs etc.
It is interesting that the people setting these standards would appear to be unaware of the `actual neutral currents in dimmer systems.If these people don't understand these basics it's hardly surprising your average sparky doesn't
Who are they? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Danny
Joined: 06 Nov 2007
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can you post a link to that spreadsheet??
Something that bugs me is when you hire powerlock leads from many companies the neutral cable is significantly smaller than the phase cables |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andy Ciddor Forums Admin

Joined: 09 May 2003 Location: Hobart, Tasmania
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Danny wrote: |
| Can you post a link to that spreadsheet?? |
The link is still up in the Members Only section.
If you aren't a member yet, you can now see the benefits of joining  _________________ Andy Ciddor |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David Ashton
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Location: perth
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 7:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Any company which hires you neutral leads smaller than load leads is clearly not competent in the area and are creating a safety hazard, if the supply is for dimmers, it is dimmers that are the specific problem, with switch mode supplies following some way behind. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rossgo
Joined: 12 May 2007 Location: SYDNEY
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sorry to bring up an older post but i found stuff on the issue of Neutral burnout
If anyone has AS3000 look under clause [b]3.5.2[/b] (pg126)
it says in section (b)(i) and (ii)
Multiphase circuit, The current-carrying capacity of the neutral conductor of a multiphase circuit shall not be less than that determined in accordance with the following
(i)Harmonic currents Where a consumers main, submain or final subcircuit supplies a substantial load that generates harmonic currents (eg fluoresent lighting, computers, soft starting starter, variable Speed devices or other electronic devices,) The third and an higher order harmonic current generated in the equipment shall be added to the maxium out of balance load to determine the current to be carried by the neutral conductor
it goes on to say
(ii) consumer mains, submains and final subcircuits, The current-carrying capacity of the neutral conductor of a multiphase consumers mains, submains or final subcircuit shall be not less than that of the current-carrying capacity of the largest associated active conductor,
and an exception says
3(b) a multiphase final subcircuit, may have a current-capacity less than that of the largest associated active conductor, provided that the predominant load consists of multiphase equipment and the maxiumum out of balance current, including any harmonic component.
is not less than the maximum out of balance current, including any harmonic
In my opinion these 3phase plugs that are attached to dimmers either 32,40,50 Amp clipsal 56 series ect are not designed to be used for devices with out of balanced harmonics like that of a heavily loaded dimmer rack.
will be interesting on what the manufactures like jands, ETC, theater light ect say about it _________________ ROSS CARDWELL
FREELANCE LIGHT & SOUND, SYSTEM TECH
SPARKY |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andy Ciddor Forums Admin

Joined: 09 May 2003 Location: Hobart, Tasmania
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rossgo wrote: |
sorry to bring up an older post but i found stuff on the issue of Neutral burnout
If anyone has AS3000 look under clause 3.5.2 (pg126)
it says in section (b)(i) and (ii)
Multiphase circuit, The current-carrying capacity of the neutral conductor of a multiphase circuit shall not be less than that determined in accordance with the following
(i)Harmonic currents Where a consumers main, submain or final subcircuit supplies a substantial load that generates harmonic currents (eg fluoresent lighting, computers, soft starting starter, variable Speed devices or other electronic devices,) The third and an higher order harmonic current generated in the equipment shall be added to the maxium out of balance load to determine the current to be carried by the neutral conductor |
If you go back over the various forums discussions on this topic you will find that I have been pointing out this clause in AS/NZS 3000 since the very beginning.
I have great joy in pointing it out to the electrical engineers on every dimming project that I work on. They either haven't read it or somehow didn't think it applied to them. Most of them don't even like the requirement for full rated neutrals in out-of-balance situations, much less oversized neutrals for high-harmonic installations. _________________ Andy Ciddor |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bivio
Joined: 01 Mar 2006 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
So only newly installed dimmers and distro boards can benefit from oversized neutrals in practical terms? Unless you spend a lot of money on existing installs, running bigger neutrals to the sub station supply.
As has been previously stated we're chained to what's in venues and wired to our portable dimmers and distro boards, to fit in with what's already out there. If we limit burn outs at the plug end, through thicker neutrals, the typical three phase principals don’t allow for our unbalanced loads.
What would the manufacturers say? I'm sure their designers know the limitatations but have to work with what's available.
If a distro board for a building is near capacity and an electrician / HVAC installer puts in a 6kw split system for the office area, they think its fine to run it off the overly generous dimmer supply. Who am I to argue, they've got the authority and nothing's blown up and admittedly the alternative is very expensive.
They didn't take too long to introduce insulated pins on 240v plugs, when it was decided, but that impacted and affected more people and didn’t involve retro fitting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David Ashton
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Location: perth
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The crucial factor in this is that the neutral pin on our stupid plugs has half the cross sectional area of the actives, the same size pin runs 20 amps max on the 20A/3 phase plugs and carries 50 amps on a 40amp 3 phase plug, it's pointless to use heavy neutral conductors and feed them into silly little neutral pins.Surely the geniuses who deem re-wireable piggy backs "dangerous" and turn our 10a single phase plugs into 15a by increasing the size of the earth pin ought to be able to figure out that the situation is serious, but when there is a major fire and lots of kids burn to death somebody might actually do something, and yes I'm pissed off with these stupid plugs and the stupid "authorities" who allow their continued use. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bivio
Joined: 01 Mar 2006 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| allthingstheatre wrote: |
| The crucial factor in this is that the neutral pin on our stupid plugs has half the cross sectional area of the actives, the same size pin runs 20 amps max on the 20A/3 phase plugs and carries 50 amps on a 40amp 3 phase plug, it's pointless to use heavy neutral conductors and feed them into silly little neutral pins.Surely the geniuses who deem re-wireable piggy backs "dangerous" and turn our 10a single phase plugs into 15a by increasing the size of the earth pin ought to be able to figure out that the situation is serious, but when there is a major fire and lots of kids burn to death somebody might actually do something, and yes I'm pissed off with these stupid plugs and the stupid "authorities" who allow their continued use. |
Yes; yes! Points taken.
Isn't this one of the reasons ALIA exists (and we're a part of it). Aside from the creative side and flashy new gear and fun stuff there's the collective technical knowledge that allows us to flag and deal with potential (long standing) problems such as this as an industry collective (with possible solutions) before anything serious ever happens. A documented response to the issue raised with action plan for the longer term would be ideal. Most worthwhile changes don't happen overnight. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hdmcc
Joined: 17 May 2008 Location: Canberra
|
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 2:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Im not that flash with power knowledge (i know enough not to overload a circuit with amounts of equipment on them) but, last year working for a company we did an install in a church and we were installing 2 jands HP12 dimmers and after we fitted them to the racks and went to plug them in we discovered they had been fitted with a 40 amp plug (it had 2 sticky-out plastics bit instead of the usual one)
so we called our jands rep and asked why and apparently they got made to start fitting them because logically, 4 10amp circuits to one phase is 40amps not 32 or something like that.
so maybe things are already changing.
thats my 2cents atleast. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David Ashton
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Location: perth
|
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| It is of course a pure "con",exactly the same plug, exactly the same undersize neutral pin, exactly the same danger, but more expensive, and the real, safe solution namely using 60A CEE plugs would be much cheaper as well as infinitely safer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andy Ciddor Forums Admin

Joined: 09 May 2003 Location: Hobart, Tasmania
|
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| allthingstheatre wrote: |
| It is of course a pure "con",exactly the same plug, exactly the same undersize neutral pin, exactly the same danger, but more expensive, and the real, safe solution namely using 60A CEE plugs would be much cheaper as well as infinitely safer. |
I have no technical argument with what Allthingstheatre is saying. However, the regulatory authorities in this region are in no position (politically or economically) to bring in retrospective standards and/or regulations. Even if we were to raise this issue with regulators (and I believe we probably should) it's going to be unpopular with most of the industry, who (a) don't want to change anything or (b) spend a single extra cent. More importantly, it will take a long time to achieve the desired outcomes, and in the interim will involve the use of many very hastily cobbled together (and likely dubious quality) adapters made from leftover or pensioned-off Wilcos. Whatever happens, it will not solve many of our problems in the short, or even medium, term.
Perhaps what we should be undertaking is a two-pronged attack on the problem by (1) spreading the word outside this small group of already-aware safety-committed lighting techs and into the general lighting industry and production community, whilst at the same time (2) working to achieve a standard for connectors that doesn't require any understanding of the problem at all.
I never though that I would be counselling patience to Allthingstheatre. It was always the other way around  _________________ Andy Ciddor |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
David Ashton
Joined: 26 Jan 2006 Location: perth
|
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| As to cost I can buy from Europe a 63 A plug for $40 and the socket for $55 and I could probably halve that cost buying in China, seeing that you will be ripped off over $100 fot a Aussie plug alone, the cost of change argument does not stack up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andy Ciddor Forums Admin

Joined: 09 May 2003 Location: Hobart, Tasmania
|
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| allthingstheatre wrote: |
| As to cost I can buy from Europe a 63 A plug for $40 and the socket for $55 and I could probably halve that cost buying in China, seeing that you will be ripped off over $100 fot a Aussie plug alone, the cost of change argument does not stack up. |
The cost of not changing every existing plug/socket pair is zero. Obviously no replacement is going to be that cheap. Besides, there are very strong guidelines in place for regulators who consider any kind of retrospective changes. If you could prove that it would save the community from losing 100 lives per year, you might have just an inkling of a chance at getting a mandatory retrofit.
In Qld where they are trying to bring in retrofitting of RCDs/ELCBs on rented properties (because there's no way they could hope to do it at all on existing residential installations), there has been a huge outcry and much regulatory timidity - and that's for an upgrade that the Coroner has determined will save lives.
Thankfully, the days when a bunch of engineers in a backroom could "accidentally" ban piggy-backs because they didn't know that we used them in the entertainment industry are long past. Now everything has to have a cost/benefit case prepared before it can be examined. Although having said that: I'm still waiting for the benefit from insulated-pin plugs to outweigh the cost of having more expensive and less reliable connectors  _________________ Andy Ciddor |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
ALIA theme adapted by Andy Ciddor from subSilver by subBlue design
|